Last updated 26 August 2026
This site publishes analyses of public YouTube comment sections, along with the evidence behind them. It is free to read and there is nothing to sign up for.
Every figure here describes what a comment section said. People who comment are not people who buy, and they skew toward enthusiasts and toward strong opinions. These analyses are a proxy for public perception and a poor proxy for sales, market share, or product quality.
Sentiment is scored by machine on a sample of each group of comments. Sarcasm detection is weak, particularly in Japanese; groups where that risk is high are flagged on the page rather than presented as settled. Treat the findings as a measurement with known error, not a verdict.
Every quote published here links to the original comment so you can check it yourself. If you find something wrong — a miscount, a mistranslation, a quote that does not match its source — email info@opitrics.com. Corrections are made to the page.
Like counts and comment counts are recorded at the time of fetching and drift afterwards. The fetch date is shown on every analysis.
You may quote and link to these analyses freely, including commercially, provided you attribute Opitrics and link to the page you took the figure from. Do not present a number from here as your own research, and do not republish a page wholesale.
Quoted comments remain the words of the people who wrote them and are reproduced here for commentary and analysis.
Vehicle and company names are the trade marks of their owners. This site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or speaking for any manufacturer, publication, or the channels whose comment sections it reads.
The analyses are provided as they are, without warranty. Decisions made on the basis of them are yours.